(The first part of this review is spoiler-free. I'll discuss the ending underneath the adorable spoiler kitten.)
The OA is an eight-episode series currently available on Netflix that was created by Brit Marling, who plays the lead, and Zal Batmanglij. It tells the story of a young blind woman named Prairie Johnson, missing for seven years, who returns home unexpectedly.
Prairie, no longer blind and inexplicably referring to herself as "The OA," won't tell the FBI or her parents (the wonderful former Borg queen Alice Krige and equally wonderful Walking Dead alum Scott Wilson) what happened to her during the seven years she was missing, although there are physical indications that she was imprisoned and abused. Instead, she begins telling her story to five random people in an abandoned house at midnight. The story, and it's a wild one, is told in chapters on successive nights throughout the succeeding episodes, and it has a dramatic effect on the lives of the five listeners, all of whom are from the local high school.
The ending of this series, or possibly first season since there are rumors that there may be a second, is controversial and is generating a lot of discussion. For me, The OA isn't so much about the ending, although I'm one of the viewers who found it quite powerful. It's my opinion that The OA is about the strength and transformative power of storytelling. We've all read books that have changed our lives and made us see the world in a new way. That's what this story did for the OA's five acolytes, four of whom are high school students: Steve, a violent outcast who deals drugs; druggie Jesse; brilliant and disadvantaged Alfonso; Buck the youngest who is trans and struggling to make his parents understand him; and Betty Broderick-Allen, a teacher.
I'm not sure if I can wholeheartedly recommend The OA. Some are finding it utterly fascinating and well worth watching (like me. I thought it was), while others are pissed about the ending and think it was a huge waste of their time. Caveat emptor?
And now, some spoilers. If you're planning to watch The OA, go no further until after you do!
What was real?
It appears that Prairie Johnson was kidnapped and imprisoned for seven years. She was blind when she was kidnapped, and regained her sight before she returned. Her five acolytes indeed used "the movements" she taught them to distract the school shooter long enough to keep him from killing the children in the cafeteria. Were the five actually sending the OA through an interdimensional portal so that she could rescue Homer and the others, or was that all in her head?
Honestly, I was about to give up on this series while watching the first episode, until I got to the end when the "I was born in Russia in 1987" thing started, oddly coinciding with the title sequence. Who puts the title sequence at the end? It was like saying, the story actually begins here. Of course, her childhood in Russia and the way she came back from the dead was very secret princess. It was so unbelievable that this was the point where I started wondering if OA was making the whole thing up. Or if maybe she believed it, but was stark raving mad.
There are so many hints and parallels throughout that make it seem possible that OA is either lying about her past and her seven years of imprisonment, or that she is mentally ill and honestly believes things that are not true. Her parents kept her medicated for nearly her entire childhood because of her unbelievable stories. There were multiple references to her head injuries. After her return home, the doctors in St. Louis said she should be committed. In the final episode, she is again being medicated and has an ankle monitor. There are also many indications that OA is psychic, which could be true even if she fabricated the whole thing.
After I finished the series, I rewatched the pilot, searching for clues. The first thing she asked when she woke after jumping off the bridge was, "Did I flatline?" She said that she was trying to get back to where she'd been held captive, even though she knew that they were gone. She also said, "We all died more times than I can count." The first thing she did when she arrived in her childhood home was attempt to find Homer Roberts on her computer, and later, she did. Although why couldn't Steve and Alfonso find evidence of her story online, too?
Did Hap exist, or was his search for proof of life after death a way that the OA used to humanize her captor? During the series, we often see things from Hap's viewpoint, even to his trips to find other NDE survivors and that strange murder of his friend at a morgue. (What the hell really happened in that morgue? What was that other guy doing?) The OA told her five acolytes that her father was a miner, and Hap's house was situated at an abandoned mine. When the OA was little and her name was Nina Azarova, her father forced her into freezing water in order to cure her fear of her nightmares of drowning in an aquarium, and note the similarity to Hap repeatedly drowning his captive subjects. Plus, the series began when the OA jumped off a bridge, and the kids on the school bus in Russia went over a bridge. Note also the use of glass or plastic during the OA's seven years of imprisonment and in the final shooting scene.
The neighborhood that the OA and her acolytes lived in was outright creepy. It looked like a typical suburb on the surface, but it consisted of jarring and oddly naked tract houses and there were often strange objects in the street. And I dare say most suburban neighborhoods don't have a half-built abandoned house sitting in the middle of an empty street? There was also the weirdness of the OA's instructions to her acolytes to leave their doors open while they were at her storytelling seances, something I found uncomfortable in present-day America; was that because the FBI instructed the Johnsons that "doors should remain open at all times"?
Steve, the OA's first follower and the character who changed the most, was introduced with a jarring, explicit sex scene right in front of a picture window showing that strange neighborhood. A drug-dealing bully with rage issues, Steve was the one who chose the other acolytes — except for teacher Betty Broderick-Allen, who basically chose herself. Grief-stricken by the recent death of her twin brother, Betty at first appeared to be a closed-minded teacher parroting the views of a rigid educational system uninterested in connecting with children who are different. Phyllis Smith is wonderful as Betty, and I thought her developing relationship with Steve, and in particular, the night she gave away her inheritance to save him from the goons from Asheville, was one of the high points of the series. I also really loved the scene where the OA impersonated Steve's stepmother and talked Betty out of expelling Steve, especially the bizarre little detail of one of the OA's fake press-on nails popping off while they were talking. Note that the OA guessed correctly that Betty had just lost a sibling, another bit that made me think she was psychic.
So let's talk about the ending.
The scene where Alfonso found the books under the OA's bed was very Usual Suspects, but it was also ambiguous. Yes, the OA could have used those books to create the details in her story, but she also could have been reading about subjects that had a relationship to her life, couldn't she? Why did Alfonso look in the mirror and see himself as Homer? And here's the big one for me. What was FBI agent Elias doing in the Johnson home alone at night, and why was he so weird and unconventional in the first place?
After I finished all eight episodes, I checked out a lot of articles and reviews on the internet. What seems to upset critics the most is the insertion of a school shooting into the narrative, supposedly out of nowhere. (That, and the admittedly silly interpretive dance "movements" that were intended to open the interdimensional portal.)
Honestly, I don't think the school shooting came out of nowhere. The focus of the entire series was saving the lives of children, and the five acolytes were all from the high school. The OA's story began with the Russian children dying on the bus, and then focused on five youths trapped under glass and killed and revived repeatedly in Hap's basement. Plus, it seemed to me that Steve fit the profile of a possible school shooter, and even though he momentarily reacted to the OA with anger in the pencil-stabbing scene, he was the one who changed the most, and for the better, over the course of the story.
We're now hearing that there may be a second season in the works. I cannot imagine what a second season could be about. Almost anything they do to answer questions about what happened in the first season might ruin the whole thing. Then again, what if the OA really did go through a portal in the end? What if Homer, Rachel, Scott and Renata do exist and are still imprisoned, waiting for her to rescue them?
A few bits:
-- OA may have meant "original angel." I thought that it could have been an interpretation of the word "away."
-- I didn't notice it the first time through, but there is a lot of purple, the color of royalty (secret princess), magic and spirituality.
-- There's Braille, too. There are actually strips on Braille on Khatun's face during the afterlife scenes. Also, the OA kept touching her white bedspread that had knobby protrusions like Braille.
-- How on earth did the OA and Homer write the symbols representing the movements on their skin? They couldn't touch each other; could anyone physically do that? Was that the reason the OA was told to make her arms longer during that scene with the bill and the trench?
-- Why were there potted plants in Hap's underground prison?
-- Why did the OA's mother Nancy freak out in the restaurant?
-- Loved the tiny blue quail eggs in milk for breakfast, and the bit in the afterlife about swallowing a bird.
So what is this show? Is it pretentious arty crap, or is it a powerful story about storytelling, mysticism and life after death? Lines are open. What did you guys think?
Billie
---
Billie Doux loves good television and spends way too much time writing about it.
I watched the first episode just yesterday and have no freaking clue how to describe this series. I mean, how did the creators come up with the story? It has so many different elements.
ReplyDeleteCreator 1: “So, let’s make a story.”
Creator 2: “Let’s! Anything on your mind?”
Creator 1: “Well, I was thinking about a woman that reappears after seven years missing, but that sounds generic, what do you think?”
Creator 2: “I liked it. We can make it special. Like, she comes back with some powers.”
Creator 1: “Oh, good one. What kind of powers?”
Creator 2: “Let’s see. She is very introspective, she can see what is inside people, their best and their worst.”
Creator 1: “And she can make them better by touching them!”
Creator 2: “Great...”
They think for a while.
Creator 1: “Oh, oh... and when she went missing, she was blind, but now she can see!”
Creator 2: “Loved that! But how will we explain all that stuff?”
Creator 1: “She died and came back from the afterlife?”
Creator 2: “Nah, that’s too simple. We need more.”
They think for another while.
Creator 2: “How about she is actually two people? A girl born in USA and another one born in Russia?”
Creator 1: “That’s very Sense8.”
Creator 2: “Wait for it. The girl in Russian has premonition powers and nosebleeds.”
Creator 1: “That’s very Stranger Things.”
Creator 2: “Right? It will be a hit on Netflix!”
Creator 1: “Hum, I don’t know.”
Creator 2: “Think about it. She is two people, one of them has the death experience at a young age and comes back from afterlife, goes blind, then several years later goes missing, and that’s the other one. She reappears, can see, acts strange, touches people, tells them to leave their houses’ door open and transforms them.”
Creator 1: “Man, now that you say it like that, I’m sold! But I don’t think that’s enough. She is also looking for a dude. They met while she was missing. And her parents! They think she is strange, distant and traumatized. There’s got be some family drama.”
Create 2: “Oh, good one. But I think... is it just me or there is still something missing?”
Create 1: “I know just what you mean. And I got it. When the Russian girl dies, the afterlife looks like an 80’s B movie, with a gipsy goddess!”
Create 2: “That’s it! We have a show!”
Now, it might seem I’m mocking the series, but I’m not. It was intriguing and I wanted to know what happened to Prairie/OA, that was a character I cared about very quickly. The story did fascinate me, especially the scene with the teacher. I hate when parents throw the responsibility on the teachers, but OA wasn’t passing for a neglectful parent, she was challenging the teacher to aim higher. I also liked what OA told Steve about his inside self. I watched those scenes twice. OA’s ability to move people moved me.
The first part of the episode had very slow pace, throwing different elements of mystery that I wasn’t sure would stick later. I can’t help but think that the writers didn’t have the most solid answers to the mysteries they were creating, because those last twenty minutes were... weird. It went all Stranger Things with the girl trapped underwater and nosebleeds. It was a little off for me.
But I plan to keep watching and see what happens next.
Best comment ever, Lamounier.
ReplyDeleteWell, I thought it was great. It's one of those shows that by the time the first episode is ending, you just know there's a totally unconventional story in the offing. I loved the ambiguity of it all, and found the silly interpretive dance movements oddly effecting. The scene where they brought Jesse back to life was superb, as was their combined effort to bring down the gunman. And I agree that the gunman was in no way out of the blue. OA had a premonition of doom, five of her 'friends' attended the same school, it made perfect sense that the disaster would somehow revolve around their lives.
ReplyDeleteThank you for recommending this show, Billie.
I'm glad you liked it too, Paul. It's fascinating how divided the response has been.
ReplyDeleteIt is KILLING me not to read beyond the spoiler kitten, but I'm only on the third episode. And since it's 1 am and I have to be up at 5, it will have to wait.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the recommendation, Billie. I can't wait to see what happens.
Brit Marling, as an actor, has a spellbinding quality in her performances and presence. This was evident in both "Another Earth" and especially "The Sound of My Voice." And as a storyteller/writer, she can spin a mesmerizing yet frustratingly ambiguous tale. Frankly, I was pulled into the OA just like her five recruits. I watched each episode with the same wide-eyed and open-mouthed mixture of fascination and devotion. It was a deeply moving ride.
ReplyDeleteI'm not sure I have to figure anything out beyond that. I loved it as I was going through it. That there is no definitive explanation at the end doesn't detract from my enjoyment, and in some ways seems almost fitting, considering the mysterious and mystical character of the OA herself.
And those movements, as well. They were other-worldly and powerful when performed first by OA and Homer to bring about the two healings and finally by the five recruits to prevent slaughter in the school cafeteria. I was convinced of their efficacy in all three instances.
Thank you for your review here. It really helped me articulate my own response.
I just finished watching the series and wanted to thank you for this wonderful review, so full of details. The kind that really makes you think about what you saw and experienced. I've read all the reviews available at Imdb and yours is the best by far!
ReplyDeleteI have no idea what this means or if it even matters, but in the subway OA was playing her violin. It's what drew Hap to her. But later, Alfonso sees it in her room and even picks it up. It seemed as though we were showed it on purpose.
ReplyDeleteI guess it could've been a spare, though.
The OA is indeed getting a second season. It'll be interesting what they do with it.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.thedailybeast.com/cheats/2017/02/08/netflix-renews-the-oa-for-season-2.html