Home TV Reviews Movie Reviews Book Reviews Frequently Asked Questions Articles About Us Support Doux

Outlander: Freedom & Whisky

Yes, we all want Claire to go back to Jamie right the heck now. But leaving her daughter, a successful medical career, flush toilets? Not a small decision to make.

It is now December 1968. After Claire decided to stop searching for Jamie and get on with her life, Roger showed up in Boston unexpectedly with interesting news: he'd just found Jamie under yet another alias in an Edinburgh print shop. And Claire had to decide all over again. What about her life in Boston? What if this printer isn't Jamie, after all? If it is, what if he doesn't love her anymore? What if, god forbid, he's married to someone else?

Most importantly, how can Claire leave her daughter in another century, possibly forever?

If Brianna had been selfish, if she had asked Claire to stay, Claire would have stayed. But in an attack of new found maturity, she didn't. Maybe that had something to do with Bree realizing at the fellowship event that Frank had cheated on Claire and had been far from perfect, or that Bree's initial career choice of history might have had everything to do with Frank and nothing to do with herself. To her credit, Bree told Claire that she loved her but didn't need her, that it was time for Claire to follow her heart. Good for Bree.

Claire also confided in her friend and partner, Joe Abernathy, who gave her the same advice: "If you have a second chance at love, you should take it." Of course, Joe had no idea that Claire might be leaving him forever. "Am I still attractive," though? Come on. Look in the mirror, Claire. Jamie will be older, too.

And then there was Roger, such a romantic. He wanted Claire to reunite with Jamie, too; after all, he made this happen because he couldn't let go of the research problem. When Claire was finding the decision impossible, he told her, "How can I help? What can I do?" Not judging, not telling her what to do. That touched a chord with me. A close friend did that for me once, when I was making the most important decision of my life.

The Batman montage was utterly adorable, one of my favorites in the series. Claire made an eighteenth century outfit out of raincoats (so smart, what with the rain in Scotland) complete with secret pockets for medical instruments and penicillin. Bree and Roger gave her Christmas gifts of old coins she could use, a history of Scotland and a topaz to explode when she went through the stones. Claire gave Bree the house and the bank accounts, and a resignation letter for Joe. And most importantly, the pearls Jamie gave her on their wedding night.


At this point, we didn't need to see the flight across the Atlantic, Claire's third trip through the stones, or the journey from Inverness to Edinburgh, because our hearts were already there. Suddenly Claire was walking down the streets of 1766 Edinburgh, and the print shop was actually easy to find. Claire walked in the door, and there he was. How perfect that she started shaking when she heard his voice, and that he was so shocked to see her that he literally passed out.

At first, I resented Jamie's absence in this episode. But then I thought about it. Really, "Freedom & Whisky" was about the lack of Jamie, about Claire not having any idea what he was doing with his life. Showing what happened to him in the two years post-Helwater would have felt jarring.

And at least he was in the last minute! It must have been horrible to wait a week to see the reunion when this episode first aired. For once I was glad I came to this series late. Next!

Bits:

— The title card vignette was of a homemade ornament for Brianna's first Christmas in 1948.

— Talented at research, a fan of Batman and Dark Shadows, Roger is my kind of guy. Love the way he talks, too and not just his accent.



— "Freedom and whisky gang tegither." How lovely that it was Robert Burns, the National Poet of Scotland, that gave Roger the answer.

— In an obvious hint about an approaching plot point, Joe and Claire examined the bones of a two hundred year old murder victim from a cave in the Caribbean, a white woman in her late forties. Anyone we know? It cannot, and I repeat, cannot be Claire.

— All of the sixties entertainment and news was about romantic love, lovers reunited, and during the Apollo 8 scene, impossible trips. I guess Claire is going to miss the moon landing in 1969.

— I hadn't realized that Claire lost her jeweled watch the first time she went through the stones. We knew she had lost Brian Fraser's ring when she returned in 1948.

— I'm too practical. I kept thinking about how difficult it is to get a flight in late December these days. Would it have been that hard in 1968?

Quotes:

Claire: "There was someone. From my past."
Joe: "So he's Scottish?"
Claire: "As Scottish as they come."
Joe: "Sounds serious."
Claire: "As serious as it comes."

Brianna: "What would your posh colleagues at Oxford say if they knew you were rotting your brain on daytime TV?"
Roger: "Ah, those troglodytes wouldn't understand the travails of the House of Collins."

Roger: "That doesn't sound like the daughter of a historian."
Brianna: "Well, I'm not, am I? I'm the daughter of an eighteenth century highlander."

Sandy: "You threw away twenty years with him. I would give anything to have just one more day."
It was like Sandy was saying what Claire was feeling.

Joe: "How do you take a trip like that and come back to life as you knew it?"

Claire: "What if he's forgotten me? Or what if he doesn't love me anymore?"
Brianna: "You told me what you felt for Jamie was the most powerful thing you ever felt in your life. Has that changed?"
Claire: "No."
Brianna: "Then you have to trust it's the same for him. You gave Jamie up for me. Now I have to give him back to you."

Claire: "Am I attractive? Sexually?"
Joe: "It's a trick question, right?"

Joe: "You're a skinny white broad with too much hair but a great ass. He'll be in heaven when he sees you, Lady Jane."

Claire: "He's a good one."
Brianna: "I know."
I like Claire's closeness to Roger.

Claire: "When I was small, I never wanted to step in puddles. I couldn't bring myself to believe that the perfect smooth expanse was no more than a thin film of water over solid earth. I believed it was an opening into some fathomless space and if I stepped in, I would drop at once and keep on falling."

Too massive a cliffhanger, but an absolutely wonderful, climactic episode. Four out of four lobster rolls with Boston cream pie,

Billie
---
Billie Doux loves good television and spends way too much time writing about it.

13 comments:

  1. lisam, I started back in July. Watched all four seasons in just over a week, and then decided I had to fill in the reviews.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I couldn't breathe during those last few minutes. Wonderful buildup until Jamie fainted dead away at which point I burst out laughing. What a perfect reintroduction.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Billie, I also cannot imagine watching this over the course of several years having just binge watched 4 1/2 seasons in the past month! Some of the waits would have been impossible!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Krisha, it appears that finally putting the first few seasons on Netflix has brought in a *LOT* of new viewers, including you and me.

    ReplyDelete
  5. My brother had been telling me to watch it for awhile. I may have started episode one a year ago but never finished. He has subsequently told me he knew Jamie was my kind of guy. He wasn’t wrong lol...I am in his debt :). It took being stuck at home for me to give it another go. Needless to say I cannot imagine not having found this show and this couple!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Okay, so I'm not done with this episode yet, but one thing is driving me crazy:

    Yes, Claire and Jamie's timelines sync up--always separate by 200 years. And kudos to Claire, Brianna, and Rodger for figuring that out.

    But why didn't they take that logic one step further and consider Gillian/Geillis? Claire knows when Geillis went through the stones (1968) and when she came out (before Claire's first trip in the 1940s). So Claire should have wondered whether she'd come through the stones at the right time, shouldn't she?

    Or is she just assuming that the stones drop you off in a particular time and then "auto-sync"? That the travel is unique to each person, not each trip?

    Anyway, I know I'm definitely overthinking this, but I don't understand why Claire isn't overthinking it, too. Maybe because she never watched Lost.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Josie, there's an explanation for why Geillis and Claire jumped a different number of years, but I can't remember where in the series it is, or if it's just in the books. Your comment about Lost made me laugh.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Oh, good! Just knowing there is an explanation is enough for me. :-)

    ReplyDelete
  9. I don't think I've ever been as pissed off at a fictional character as I was in this episode. My daughter is about to turn 18, and I can't imagine ever making a decision that would likely mean I could never see or speak to her ever again. Obviously there's no real world equivalent these days, even leaving the UK to Australia is just a 20 hour flight away. But the idea of thinking "Fuck it, I'll abandon my only child on the off chance I'll see my ex-husband again", I just don't understand how any parent would make that choice.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Trousers, you have a valid point. I could never leave my daughter in another century.

      But I've never been in Claire's situation, deeply in love with someone who loved me back. Bree has grown up and has left home, has started a life of her own. Claire was able to leave her financial stability and support. Is Claire supposed to spend the rest of her life living alone waiting for her daughter to visit?

      I also think it's something of a given that Claire has traveled through time three times now. If Jamie hadn't been there, or if their feelings for each other have changed, Claire would return, wouldn't she?

      (Trying not to post a spoiler for future episodes here.)

      Delete
    2. The thing is, Claire could be happy in her own time, but she's just too damn stubborn to let herself love anyone other than Jamie. Maybe it could never have worked with Frank, he looks like her worst enemy, and there's too much other history there. But aside from professionally, she never really tries to build herself a life again in the 50s.

      It's just seems like such a selfish decision from Claire, and that's not a trait I usually associate with her. Brianna is not in a good place when she leaves. Her Dads died, she finds out he wasn't really her Dad, and some long dead Scotsman was. She's failing university, she just seems to be spiralling a bit. I just don't get how anyone could leave their kid at that point.

      Don't get me wrong, I'm loving the show, and this season is probably my favourite so far. I don't think I could get this angry at a show I didn't love. So I'm very grateful you convinced me to keep watching after the end of season 1 Billie.

      And one of the things I love about it is how it makes me examine my biases. Women so rarely get to be stubborn and selfish in fiction, and I wonder if I'd be any where near as annoyed with Claire had she been the opposite sex.

      Delete
    3. Trousers, what you said -- "Women so rarely get to be stubborn and selfish in fiction, and I wonder if I'd be any where near as annoyed with Claire had she been the opposite sex" -- is absolutely it. Plus what you said about Australia. If she had found that Jamie was living on the other side of the world and that if she reunited with him, she would very rarely see her daughter, we'd get it.

      Delete

We love comments! Just note that we always moderate because of spam and trolls. It's never too late to comment on an old show, but please don’t spoil future episodes for newbies.